Axonius vs Zero Networks
Axonius vs Zero Networks, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Axonius is on 76/100 and Zero Networks on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Axonius
- our overall score: 76/100 against 60/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 740 against 182
- funding raised: $595M against $100M
- LinkedIn following: 52,398 against 12,695
Zero Networks
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 21/100
- headcount growth: +58.1% against +14.0%
At a glance
| Measure | Axonius | Zero Networks |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyber asset attack surface management and SaaS management platform for IT and security teams. | Automated zero trust network segmentation and remote access platform. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Policy Management, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) | Cybersecurity, Network, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Axonius | Zero Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 740 | 182 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.0% | +58.1% |
| Total funding | $595M | $100M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Not published |
| Valuation | $2.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 52,398 | 12,695 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Axonius | Zero Networks |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Axonius | Zero Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Self Managed |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Alpinejs, Bootstrap |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Axonius vs Zero Networks: common questions
Which is better, Axonius or Zero Networks?
On our 0-100 score Axonius rates higher (76/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Axonius and Zero Networks compare on the numbers?
Axonius leads on our overall score (76/100 against 60/100), domain rating (73/100 against 59/100), headcount (740 against 182), funding raised ($595M against $100M), LinkedIn following (52,398 against 12,695). Zero Networks leads on agent readiness (49/100 against 21/100), headcount growth (+58.1% against +14.0%).
Read the full Axonius review and pricing or the Zero Networks review and pricing. You can also browse other Axonius alternatives we track.