Axonius vs Swif.ai
Axonius vs Swif.ai, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Axonius is on 76/100 and Swif.ai on 44/100.
Where each one leads
Axonius
- our overall score: 76/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 740 against 42
- funding raised: $595M against $3.5M
- LinkedIn following: 52,398 against 3,126
Swif.ai
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Axonius | Swif.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyber asset attack surface management and SaaS management platform for IT and security teams. | Unified device management and security platform for Windows, Mac, and Linux, targeting enterprises and vCISOs. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Policy Management, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) | Endpoint Security, Device Management, Cybersecurity, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Axonius | Swif.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 740 | 42 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $595M | $3.5M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Not published |
| Valuation | $2.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 52,398 | 3,126 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Axonius | Swif.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 44/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 41/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Axonius | Swif.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Payments | Not detected | Stripe |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Microsoft Clarity +2 more |
| Support stack | Not detected | Intercom, HubSpot |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Axonius | Swif.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Unified Device Management, Real-time Shadow IT Detection, Automated Compliance, Self-service Software Portal, Remote Monitoring & Control, Swif Browser Extension |
What users say
| Measure | Axonius | Swif.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 3.0/5 from 2 votes |
Axonius vs Swif.ai: common questions
Which is better, Axonius or Swif.ai?
On our 0-100 score Axonius rates higher (76/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Axonius and Swif.ai compare on the numbers?
Axonius leads on our overall score (76/100 against 44/100), headcount (740 against 42), funding raised ($595M against $3.5M), LinkedIn following (52,398 against 3,126). Swif.ai leads on agent readiness (44/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Axonius review and pricing or the Swif.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Axonius alternatives we track.