Axonius vs Strike Graph
Axonius vs Strike Graph, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Axonius is on 76/100 and Strike Graph on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Axonius
- our overall score: 76/100 against 58/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 740 against 41
- funding raised: $595M against $28.4M
- LinkedIn following: 52,398 against 3,884
Strike Graph
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Axonius | Strike Graph |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyber asset attack surface management and SaaS management platform for IT and security teams. | AI-native compliance platform for faster security certifications and streamlined audits. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Policy Management, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) | Cybersecurity, Compliance Management, Security Certifications, Audit Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Axonius | Strike Graph |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 740 | 41 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $595M | $28.4M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Series A |
| Valuation | $2.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 52,398 | 3,884 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Axonius | Strike Graph |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 47/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Axonius | Strike Graph |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Axonius vs Strike Graph: common questions
Which is better, Axonius or Strike Graph?
On our 0-100 score Axonius rates higher (76/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Axonius and Strike Graph compare on the numbers?
Axonius leads on our overall score (76/100 against 58/100), domain rating (73/100 against 53/100), headcount (740 against 41), funding raised ($595M against $28.4M), LinkedIn following (52,398 against 3,884). Strike Graph leads on agent readiness (54/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Axonius review and pricing or the Strike Graph review and pricing. You can also browse other Axonius alternatives we track.