Axonius vs Puck
Axonius vs Puck, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Axonius is on 76/100 and Puck on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Axonius
- our overall score: 76/100 against 52/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 10/100
- headcount: 740 against 74
Puck
- agent readiness: 74/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Axonius | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyber asset attack surface management and SaaS management platform for IT and security teams. | Open-source, AI-driven endpoint investigation tool for security teams. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Policy Management, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) | Endpoint Security, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Open Source |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | Not published |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Axonius | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 740 | 74 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $595M | Not published |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Not published |
| Valuation | $2.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 52,398 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Axonius | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | B (74/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 10/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Axonius | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | PostHog |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Axonius vs Puck: common questions
Which is better, Axonius or Puck?
On our 0-100 score Axonius rates higher (76/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Axonius and Puck compare on the numbers?
Axonius leads on our overall score (76/100 against 52/100), domain rating (73/100 against 10/100), headcount (740 against 74). Puck leads on agent readiness (74/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Axonius review and pricing or the Puck review and pricing. You can also browse other Axonius alternatives we track.