Axonius vs Paubox
Axonius vs Paubox, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Axonius is on 76/100 and Paubox on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Axonius
- our overall score: 76/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 740 against 46
- funding raised: $595M against $14.2M
- LinkedIn following: 52,398 against 3,915
Paubox
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Axonius | Paubox |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyber asset attack surface management and SaaS management platform for IT and security teams. | HIPAA compliant email security and marketing solutions for organizations handling sensitive data. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Policy Management, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) | Cybersecurity, HIPAA Compliance, Email Security, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Salt Lake City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Axonius | Paubox |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 740 | 46 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $595M | $14.2M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Series A2 |
| Valuation | $2.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 52,398 | 3,915 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Axonius | Paubox |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 77/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Axonius | Paubox |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Axonius vs Paubox: common questions
Which is better, Axonius or Paubox?
On our 0-100 score Axonius rates higher (76/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Axonius and Paubox compare on the numbers?
Axonius leads on our overall score (76/100 against 52/100), headcount (740 against 46), funding raised ($595M against $14.2M), LinkedIn following (52,398 against 3,915). Paubox leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Axonius review and pricing or the Paubox review and pricing. You can also browse other Axonius alternatives we track.