Axonius vs Nucleus Security
Axonius vs Nucleus Security, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Axonius is on 76/100 and Nucleus Security on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Axonius
- our overall score: 76/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 740 against 123
- funding raised: $595M against $20.0M
- LinkedIn following: 52,398 against 17,516
Nucleus Security
- agent readiness: 64/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Axonius | Nucleus Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyber asset attack surface management and SaaS management platform for IT and security teams. | Enterprise exposure management platform that centralizes and normalizes vulnerability, asset, and risk data. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Policy Management, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) | Cybersecurity, Vulnerability Management, Exposure Management, IT Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Columbia, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Axonius | Nucleus Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 740 | 123 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $595M | $20.0M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Series C |
| Valuation | $2.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 52,398 | 17,516 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Axonius | Nucleus Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | C (64/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Axonius | Nucleus Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Axonius vs Nucleus Security: common questions
Which is better, Axonius or Nucleus Security?
On our 0-100 score Axonius rates higher (76/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Axonius and Nucleus Security compare on the numbers?
Axonius leads on our overall score (76/100 against 56/100), domain rating (73/100 against 60/100), headcount (740 against 123), funding raised ($595M against $20.0M), LinkedIn following (52,398 against 17,516). Nucleus Security leads on agent readiness (64/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Axonius review and pricing or the Nucleus Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Axonius alternatives we track.