Axonius vs Native
Axonius vs Native, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Axonius is on 76/100 and Native on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Axonius
- our overall score: 76/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 740 against 38
- funding raised: $595M against $42.0M
Native
- agent readiness: 60/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Axonius | Native |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyber asset attack surface management and SaaS management platform for IT and security teams. | Simplifies multi-cloud security by enabling organizations to fully utilize built-in cloud protections. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Policy Management, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) | Cybersecurity, Cloud Security, Enterprise Software, SaaS |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Axonius | Native |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 740 | 38 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $595M | $42.0M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Series A |
| Valuation | $2.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 52,398 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Axonius | Native |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | C (60/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Axonius | Native |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Axonius vs Native: common questions
Which is better, Axonius or Native?
On our 0-100 score Axonius rates higher (76/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Axonius and Native compare on the numbers?
Axonius leads on our overall score (76/100 against 55/100), domain rating (73/100 against 29/100), headcount (740 against 38), funding raised ($595M against $42.0M). Native leads on agent readiness (60/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Axonius review and pricing or the Native review and pricing. You can also browse other Axonius alternatives we track.