Axonius vs Guard.io
Axonius vs Guard.io, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Axonius is on 76/100 and Guard.io on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Axonius
- our overall score: 76/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 740 against 152
- funding raised: $595M against $47.0M
- LinkedIn following: 52,398 against 21,366
Guard.io
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 21/100
- headcount growth: +71.2% against +14.0%
At a glance
| Measure | Axonius | Guard.io |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyber asset attack surface management and SaaS management platform for IT and security teams. | Browser security extension protecting users from phishing, scams, and malicious extensions. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Policy Management, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) | Cybersecurity, Personal, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Axonius | Guard.io |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 740 | 152 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.0% | +71.2% |
| Total funding | $595M | $47.0M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $2.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 52,398 | 21,366 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Axonius | Guard.io |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Axonius | Guard.io |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
Axonius vs Guard.io: common questions
Which is better, Axonius or Guard.io?
On our 0-100 score Axonius rates higher (76/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Axonius and Guard.io compare on the numbers?
Axonius leads on our overall score (76/100 against 63/100), headcount (740 against 152), funding raised ($595M against $47.0M), LinkedIn following (52,398 against 21,366). Guard.io leads on agent readiness (58/100 against 21/100), headcount growth (+71.2% against +14.0%).
Read the full Axonius review and pricing or the Guard.io review and pricing. You can also browse other Axonius alternatives we track.