Axonius vs Fleet Device Management
Axonius vs Fleet Device Management, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Axonius is on 76/100 and Fleet Device Management on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Axonius
- our overall score: 76/100 against 55/100
- funding raised: $595M against $32.0M
Fleet Device Management
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Axonius | Fleet Device Management |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyber asset attack surface management and SaaS management platform for IT and security teams. | Autonomous endpoint management platform to counter AI-accelerated exploits. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Policy Management, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Endpoint Management, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Francisco, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Axonius | Fleet Device Management |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 740 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $595M | $32.0M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Series B |
| Valuation | $2.6B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 52,398 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Axonius | Fleet Device Management |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 38/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Axonius | Fleet Device Management |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Segment |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Axonius vs Fleet Device Management: common questions
Which is better, Axonius or Fleet Device Management?
On our 0-100 score Axonius rates higher (76/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Axonius and Fleet Device Management compare on the numbers?
Axonius leads on our overall score (76/100 against 55/100), funding raised ($595M against $32.0M).
Read the full Axonius review and pricing or the Fleet Device Management review and pricing. You can also browse other Axonius alternatives we track.