Axonius vs F Secure
Axonius vs F Secure, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Axonius is on 76/100 and F Secure on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Axonius
- our overall score: 76/100 against 54/100
- funding raised: $595M against $39.9M
F Secure
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 73/100
- headcount: 1,772 against 740
At a glance
| Measure | Axonius | F Secure |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyber asset attack surface management and SaaS management platform for IT and security teams. | Finnish cybersecurity company providing award-winning security and privacy solutions for consumers. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Policy Management, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) | Cybersecurity, Endpoint Security, Privacy Protection, VPN |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 1988 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Helsinki, Finland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Axonius | F Secure |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 740 | 1,772 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $595M | $39.9M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Not published |
| Valuation | $2.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 52,398 | 60,358 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Axonius | F Secure |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Axonius | F Secure |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Netlify |
| CDN | Vercel | Netlify |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Axonius vs F Secure: common questions
Which is better, Axonius or F Secure?
On our 0-100 score Axonius rates higher (76/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Axonius and F Secure compare on the numbers?
Axonius leads on our overall score (76/100 against 54/100), funding raised ($595M against $39.9M). F Secure leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 21/100), domain rating (83/100 against 73/100), headcount (1,772 against 740).
Read the full Axonius review and pricing or the F Secure review and pricing. You can also browse other Axonius alternatives we track.