Axonius vs Ent
Axonius vs Ent, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Axonius is on 76/100 and Ent on 44/100.
Where each one leads
Axonius
- our overall score: 76/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 27/100
- funding raised: $595M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 52,398 against 881
Ent
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Axonius | Ent |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyber asset attack surface management and SaaS management platform for IT and security teams. | Ent is the Intent-Aware Workspace Security Platform that protects work as it happens. It reads human, AI, and application activity in real time and steps in at the moment of risk, not days later. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Policy Management, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) | Cybersecurity, Endpoint Security, Threat Detection, AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Axonius | Ent |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 740 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $595M | $12.0M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Seed |
| Valuation | $2.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 52,398 | 881 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Axonius | Ent |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 44/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 35/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Axonius | Ent |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Axonius vs Ent: common questions
Which is better, Axonius or Ent?
On our 0-100 score Axonius rates higher (76/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Axonius and Ent compare on the numbers?
Axonius leads on our overall score (76/100 against 44/100), domain rating (73/100 against 27/100), funding raised ($595M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (52,398 against 881). Ent leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Axonius review and pricing or the Ent review and pricing. You can also browse other Axonius alternatives we track.