Axonius vs Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry)
Axonius vs Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry), compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Axonius is on 76/100 and Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Axonius
- our overall score: 76/100 against 66/100
- funding raised: $595M against $136M
Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry)
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 73/100
- headcount: 2,013 against 740
- LinkedIn following: 323,935 against 52,398
At a glance
| Measure | Axonius | Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyber asset attack surface management and SaaS management platform for IT and security teams. | AI-powered endpoint security solutions that proactively prevent threats. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Policy Management, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) | Endpoint Security, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Irvine, USA |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Axonius | Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 740 | 2,013 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $595M | $136M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Series E |
| Valuation | $2.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 52,398 | 323,935 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Axonius | Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 85/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Axonius | Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Netlify |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Axonius vs Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry): common questions
Which is better, Axonius or Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry)?
On our 0-100 score Axonius rates higher (76/100 against 66/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Axonius and Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) compare on the numbers?
Axonius leads on our overall score (76/100 against 66/100), funding raised ($595M against $136M). Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) leads on agent readiness (41/100 against 21/100), domain rating (90/100 against 73/100), headcount (2,013 against 740), LinkedIn following (323,935 against 52,398).
Read the full Axonius review and pricing or the Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) review and pricing. You can also browse other Axonius alternatives we track.