Axonius vs Chaintroopers
Axonius vs Chaintroopers, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Axonius is on 76/100 and Chaintroopers on 16/100.
Where each one leads
Axonius
- our overall score: 76/100 against 16/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 0/100
- headcount: 740 against 2
- headcount growth: +14.0% against -27.4%
- LinkedIn following: 52,398 against 144
Chaintroopers
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Axonius | Chaintroopers |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyber asset attack surface management and SaaS management platform for IT and security teams. | Blockchain security audits and research to protect organizations from cyber attacks. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Policy Management, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) | Metaverse, Cybersecurity, Blockchain, Web3 |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2017 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Axonius | Chaintroopers |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 740 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.0% | -27.4% |
| Total funding | $595M | Not published |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Bootstrapped |
| Valuation | $2.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 52,398 | 144 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Axonius | Chaintroopers |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 16/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 5/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 0/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Axonius | Chaintroopers |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Nuxt, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Axonius vs Chaintroopers: common questions
Which is better, Axonius or Chaintroopers?
On our 0-100 score Axonius rates higher (76/100 against 16/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Axonius and Chaintroopers compare on the numbers?
Axonius leads on our overall score (76/100 against 16/100), domain rating (73/100 against 0/100), headcount (740 against 2), headcount growth (+14.0% against -27.4%), LinkedIn following (52,398 against 144). Chaintroopers leads on agent readiness (43/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Axonius review and pricing or the Chaintroopers review and pricing. You can also browse other Axonius alternatives we track.