Avast vs SafeHouse Technologies
Avast vs SafeHouse Technologies, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Avast is on 24/100 and SafeHouse Technologies on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Avast
- domain rating: 87/100 against 27/100
- funding raised: $100M against $2.8M
SafeHouse Technologies
- our overall score: 48/100 against 24/100
- headcount: 72 against 5
- LinkedIn following: 10,541 against 144
At a glance
| Measure | Avast | SafeHouse Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global leader in cybersecurity, providing digital security products for consumers and businesses worldwide. | Smart, simple, and secure online companion for privacy and threat protection. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Antivirus Software, Internet Security, Endpoint Security | Cybersecurity, IoT, Privacy, Consumer App |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1988 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Avast | SafeHouse Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5 | 72 |
| Total funding | $100M | $2.8M |
| Latest round | Grant (prize money) | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 144 | 10,541 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Avast | SafeHouse Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 24/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 27/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 15/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (54/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 87/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Avast | SafeHouse Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Shopify |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
Avast vs SafeHouse Technologies: common questions
Which is better, Avast or SafeHouse Technologies?
On our 0-100 score SafeHouse Technologies rates higher (48/100 against 24/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Avast and SafeHouse Technologies compare on the numbers?
Avast leads on domain rating (87/100 against 27/100), funding raised ($100M against $2.8M). SafeHouse Technologies leads on our overall score (48/100 against 24/100), headcount (72 against 5), LinkedIn following (10,541 against 144).
Read the full Avast review and pricing or the SafeHouse Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other Avast alternatives we track.

