Auto-GPT vs Superagent
Auto-GPT vs Superagent, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Auto-GPT is on 53/100 and Superagent on 35/100.
Where each one leads
Auto-GPT
- our overall score: 53/100 against 35/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 64/100 against 56/100
Superagent
- headcount: 3 against 2
At a glance
| Measure | Auto-GPT | Superagent |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source autonomous AI agent platform that automates complex digital workflows. | Open-source infrastructure for coding agents, enabling AI to plan, generate, and deploy software autonomously. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Open Source, Workflow Automation | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Autonomous Systems, Developer Tools |
| Sells toBusiness model | Open Source | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Auto-GPT | Superagent |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 3 |
| Total funding | $12.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 213 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Auto-GPT | Superagent |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 35/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 6/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 56/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Auto-GPT | Superagent |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Auto-GPT | Superagent |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | VibeKit SDK, Agent Orchestration, Secure Sandbox Integration, Autonomous Agent Workflows, Developer-Facing Interfaces, Active Learning & Evolution |
Auto-GPT vs Superagent: common questions
Which is better, Auto-GPT or Superagent?
On our 0-100 score Auto-GPT rates higher (53/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Auto-GPT and Superagent compare on the numbers?
Auto-GPT leads on our overall score (53/100 against 35/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 51/100), domain rating (64/100 against 56/100). Superagent leads on headcount (3 against 2).
Read the full Auto-GPT review and pricing or the Superagent review and pricing. You can also browse other Auto-GPT alternatives we track.