Asimov vs Uma
Asimov vs Uma, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Asimov is on 43/100 and Uma on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Asimov
- domain rating: 53/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 122 against 29
- LinkedIn following: 14,531 against 5,831
Uma
- our overall score: 58/100 against 43/100
At a glance
| Measure | Asimov | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Crowdsourcing training data for humanoid robots from real-world human demonstrations. | Developing advanced physical AI and humanoid robots for industrial and domestic environments, focusing on real-world performance and learning through demonstration. |
| Category | Robotics, Humanoid Robots, Embodied AI, AI Training Data | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2022 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Asimov | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 122 | 29 |
| Open roles | 3 | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 14,531 | 5,831 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Asimov | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 40/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 53/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Asimov | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Asimov vs Uma: common questions
Which is better, Asimov or Uma?
On our 0-100 score Uma rates higher (58/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Asimov and Uma compare on the numbers?
Asimov leads on domain rating (53/100 against 36/100), headcount (122 against 29), LinkedIn following (14,531 against 5,831). Uma leads on our overall score (58/100 against 43/100).
Read the full Asimov review and pricing or the Uma review and pricing. You can also browse other Asimov alternatives we track.

