ARMO vs KTrust
ARMO vs KTrust, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ARMO is on 56/100 and KTrust on 53/100.
Where each one leads
ARMO
- our overall score: 56/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 60/100 against 11/100
- headcount: 39 against 30
- funding raised: $34.5M against $5.3M
- LinkedIn following: 4,877 against 1,280
KTrust
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 21/100
- headcount growth: +62.0% against -30.9%
At a glance
| Measure | ARMO | KTrust |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ARMO provides an open-source Kubernetes security platform, Kubescape, for end-to-end security from development to production. | Proactive Kubernetes security platform identifying and mitigating actual attack path exposures. |
| Category | Enterprise, Open Source, Kubernetes, Cybersecurity | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Kubernetes, DevSecOps |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ARMO | KTrust |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 30 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -30.9% | +62.0% |
| Total funding | $34.5M | $5.3M |
| Latest round | Series A | Grant |
| Valuation | Not published | $25.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,877 | 1,280 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ARMO | KTrust |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 11/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ARMO | KTrust |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
ARMO vs KTrust: common questions
Which is better, ARMO or KTrust?
On our 0-100 score ARMO rates higher (56/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ARMO and KTrust compare on the numbers?
ARMO leads on our overall score (56/100 against 53/100), domain rating (60/100 against 11/100), headcount (39 against 30), funding raised ($34.5M against $5.3M), LinkedIn following (4,877 against 1,280). KTrust leads on agent readiness (41/100 against 21/100), headcount growth (+62.0% against -30.9%).
Read the full ARMO review and pricing or the KTrust review and pricing. You can also browse other ARMO alternatives we track.