Ark Surgical vs Radiaction
Ark Surgical vs Radiaction, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ark Surgical is on 47/100 and Radiaction on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Ark Surgical
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 42/100
Radiaction
- our overall score: 57/100 against 47/100
- headcount: 26 against 13
- headcount growth: +1.4% against -9.4%
- funding raised: $62.6M against $3.2M
- LinkedIn following: 2,766 against 1,294
At a glance
| Measure | Ark Surgical | Radiaction |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Israeli medical device company developing FDA-cleared tissue containment systems for women's health. | Radiaction Medical revolutionizes radiation protection for interventional medical teams with innovative, user-independent shielding solutions. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Device, Surgical Device, MedTech | Healthcare, Medical Device, Radiation, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ark Surgical | Radiaction |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 13 | 26 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -9.4% | +1.4% |
| Total funding | $3.2M | $62.6M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,294 | 2,766 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ark Surgical | Radiaction |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 44/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 10/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 14/100 | 15/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ark Surgical | Radiaction |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Wix | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Ark Surgical vs Radiaction: common questions
Which is better, Ark Surgical or Radiaction?
On our 0-100 score Radiaction rates higher (57/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ark Surgical and Radiaction compare on the numbers?
Ark Surgical leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 42/100). Radiaction leads on our overall score (57/100 against 47/100), headcount (26 against 13), headcount growth (+1.4% against -9.4%), funding raised ($62.6M against $3.2M), LinkedIn following (2,766 against 1,294).
Read the full Ark Surgical review and pricing or the Radiaction review and pricing. You can also browse other Ark Surgical alternatives we track.