Aqua Security vs StackRox
Aqua Security vs StackRox, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aqua Security is on 69/100 and StackRox on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Aqua Security
- our overall score: 69/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 47/100
- funding raised: $401M against $26.5M
StackRox
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Aqua Security | StackRox |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud native security platform for prevention, detection, and response across the application lifecycle. | Kubernetes-native security platform for containerized applications, providing visibility, risk detection, and compliance enforcement. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cloud Native, Container | Cybersecurity, Cloud Security, Container Security, Kubernetes Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Mountain View, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aqua Security | StackRox |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 466 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $401M | $26.5M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series C |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,597 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aqua Security | StackRox |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 37/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 10/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aqua Security | StackRox |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Fastly |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Aqua Security vs StackRox: common questions
Which is better, Aqua Security or StackRox?
On our 0-100 score Aqua Security rates higher (69/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aqua Security and StackRox compare on the numbers?
Aqua Security leads on our overall score (69/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 40/100), domain rating (78/100 against 47/100), funding raised ($401M against $26.5M).
Read the full Aqua Security review and pricing or the StackRox review and pricing. You can also browse other Aqua Security alternatives we track.