Aqua Security vs PureSec
Aqua Security vs PureSec, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aqua Security is on 69/100 and PureSec on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Aqua Security
- our overall score: 69/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 466 against 3
- funding raised: $401M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 66,597 against 1,906
PureSec
- domain rating: 88/100 against 78/100
At a glance
| Measure | Aqua Security | PureSec |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud native security platform for prevention, detection, and response across the application lifecycle. | Global leader in serverless architecture security, enabling secure and reliable serverless applications. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cloud Native, Container | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Development, Serverless |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aqua Security | PureSec |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 466 | 3 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $401M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,597 | 1,906 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aqua Security | PureSec |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 41/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aqua Security | PureSec |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Aqua Security vs PureSec: common questions
Which is better, Aqua Security or PureSec?
On our 0-100 score Aqua Security rates higher (69/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aqua Security and PureSec compare on the numbers?
Aqua Security leads on our overall score (69/100 against 55/100), headcount (466 against 3), funding raised ($401M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (66,597 against 1,906). PureSec leads on domain rating (88/100 against 78/100).
Read the full Aqua Security review and pricing or the PureSec review and pricing. You can also browse other Aqua Security alternatives we track.