Aqua Security vs Piiano
Aqua Security vs Piiano, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aqua Security is on 69/100 and Piiano on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Aqua Security
- our overall score: 69/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 466 against 18
- headcount growth: -0.5% against -12.3%
- funding raised: $401M against $9.0M
- LinkedIn following: 66,597 against 4,263
Piiano
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Aqua Security | Piiano |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud native security platform for prevention, detection, and response across the application lifecycle. | Piiano provides developer infrastructure for data protection and compliance, helping companies prevent data breaches and exfiltration at the code level. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cloud Native, Container | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, PII, Personal Identifiable Information |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aqua Security | Piiano |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 466 | 18 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.5% | -12.3% |
| Total funding | $401M | $9.0M |
| Latest round | Series E | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,597 | 4,263 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aqua Security | Piiano |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 32/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aqua Security | Piiano |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Aqua Security vs Piiano: common questions
Which is better, Aqua Security or Piiano?
On our 0-100 score Aqua Security rates higher (69/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aqua Security and Piiano compare on the numbers?
Aqua Security leads on our overall score (69/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 38/100), domain rating (78/100 against 32/100), headcount (466 against 18), headcount growth (-0.5% against -12.3%), funding raised ($401M against $9.0M), LinkedIn following (66,597 against 4,263).
Read the full Aqua Security review and pricing or the Piiano review and pricing. You can also browse other Aqua Security alternatives we track.