Aqua Security vs Guardium
Aqua Security vs Guardium, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aqua Security is on 69/100 and Guardium on 34/100.
Where each one leads
Aqua Security
- our overall score: 69/100 against 34/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 31/100
- funding raised: $401M against $35.8M
Guardium
- domain rating: 92/100 against 78/100
- headcount: 336,401 against 466
- LinkedIn following: 19,634,656 against 66,597
At a glance
| Measure | Aqua Security | Guardium |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud native security platform for prevention, detection, and response across the application lifecycle. | Comprehensive data security platform for real-time monitoring, vulnerability assessment, and compliance reporting. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cloud Native, Container | Enterprise, Security, Cybersecurity, Data Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2001 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Waltham, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aqua Security | Guardium |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 466 | 336,401 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $401M | $35.8M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series C |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,597 | 19,634,656 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aqua Security | Guardium |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 34/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 30/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 92/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aqua Security | Guardium |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Aqua Security vs Guardium: common questions
Which is better, Aqua Security or Guardium?
On our 0-100 score Aqua Security rates higher (69/100 against 34/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aqua Security and Guardium compare on the numbers?
Aqua Security leads on our overall score (69/100 against 34/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 31/100), funding raised ($401M against $35.8M). Guardium leads on domain rating (92/100 against 78/100), headcount (336,401 against 466), LinkedIn following (19,634,656 against 66,597).
Read the full Aqua Security review and pricing or the Guardium review and pricing. You can also browse other Aqua Security alternatives we track.