Aqua Security vs Gem Security
Aqua Security vs Gem Security, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aqua Security is on 69/100 and Gem Security on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Aqua Security
- our overall score: 69/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 466 against 25
- headcount growth: -0.5% against -24.1%
- funding raised: $401M against $34.0M
- LinkedIn following: 66,597 against 5,851
Gem Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Aqua Security | Gem Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud native security platform for prevention, detection, and response across the application lifecycle. | Cloud-native threat detection, investigation, and response platform for enterprise security. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cloud Native, Container | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cloud Security, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aqua Security | Gem Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 466 | 25 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.5% | -24.1% |
| Total funding | $401M | $34.0M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,597 | 5,851 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aqua Security | Gem Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aqua Security | Gem Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Aqua Security vs Gem Security: common questions
Which is better, Aqua Security or Gem Security?
On our 0-100 score Aqua Security rates higher (69/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aqua Security and Gem Security compare on the numbers?
Aqua Security leads on our overall score (69/100 against 61/100), headcount (466 against 25), headcount growth (-0.5% against -24.1%), funding raised ($401M against $34.0M), LinkedIn following (66,597 against 5,851).
Read the full Aqua Security review and pricing or the Gem Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Aqua Security alternatives we track.