Aqua Security vs FortiCNAPP
Aqua Security vs FortiCNAPP, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aqua Security is on 69/100 and FortiCNAPP on 44/100.
Where each one leads
Aqua Security
- our overall score: 69/100 against 44/100
FortiCNAPP
- domain rating: 89/100 against 78/100
- funding raised: $1.8B against $401M
At a glance
| Measure | Aqua Security | FortiCNAPP |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud native security platform for prevention, detection, and response across the application lifecycle. | Fortinet's AI-driven platform for comprehensive cloud-native application protection from code to cloud. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cloud Native, Container | Cloud Security, Application Security, DevSecOps, Cloud-Native Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Sunnyvale, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aqua Security | FortiCNAPP |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 466 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $401M | $1.8B |
| Latest round | Series E | Venture Round |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $8.3B |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,597 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aqua Security | FortiCNAPP |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 44/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 4/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 89/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aqua Security | FortiCNAPP |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Aqua Security vs FortiCNAPP: common questions
Which is better, Aqua Security or FortiCNAPP?
On our 0-100 score Aqua Security rates higher (69/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aqua Security and FortiCNAPP compare on the numbers?
Aqua Security leads on our overall score (69/100 against 44/100). FortiCNAPP leads on domain rating (89/100 against 78/100), funding raised ($1.8B against $401M).
Read the full Aqua Security review and pricing or the FortiCNAPP review and pricing. You can also browse other Aqua Security alternatives we track.