Aqua Security vs Falco
Aqua Security vs Falco, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aqua Security is on 69/100 and Falco on 10/100.
Where each one leads
Aqua Security
- our overall score: 69/100 against 10/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 36/100
Falco
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Aqua Security | Falco |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud native security platform for prevention, detection, and response across the application lifecycle. | Open-source, cloud-native runtime security tool for detecting anomalous application behavior across hosts, containers, and Kubernetes. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cloud Native, Container | Cybersecurity, Cloud Computing, Open Source, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aqua Security | Falco |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 466 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $401M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series E | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,597 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aqua Security | Falco |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 10/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 5/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aqua Security | Falco |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Netlify |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Aqua Security vs Falco: common questions
Which is better, Aqua Security or Falco?
On our 0-100 score Aqua Security rates higher (69/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aqua Security and Falco compare on the numbers?
Aqua Security leads on our overall score (69/100 against 10/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 36/100).
Read the full Aqua Security review and pricing or the Falco review and pricing. You can also browse other Aqua Security alternatives we track.