Aqua Security vs Entitle
Aqua Security vs Entitle, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aqua Security is on 69/100 and Entitle on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Aqua Security
- our overall score: 69/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 466 against 23
- funding raised: $401M against $15.0M
- LinkedIn following: 66,597 against 3,847
Entitle
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Aqua Security | Entitle |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud native security platform for prevention, detection, and response across the application lifecycle. | Simplifies granular and temporary access for cloud-intensive companies, reducing risk. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cloud Native, Container | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), Identity Management, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aqua Security | Entitle |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 466 | 23 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $401M | $15.0M |
| Latest round | Series E | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,597 | 3,847 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aqua Security | Entitle |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aqua Security | Entitle |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Aqua Security vs Entitle: common questions
Which is better, Aqua Security or Entitle?
On our 0-100 score Aqua Security rates higher (69/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aqua Security and Entitle compare on the numbers?
Aqua Security leads on our overall score (69/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 21/100), domain rating (78/100 against 36/100), headcount (466 against 23), funding raised ($401M against $15.0M), LinkedIn following (66,597 against 3,847).
Read the full Aqua Security review and pricing or the Entitle review and pricing. You can also browse other Aqua Security alternatives we track.