Aqua Security vs Dazz
Aqua Security vs Dazz, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aqua Security is on 69/100 and Dazz on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Aqua Security
- headcount: 466 against 52
- funding raised: $401M against $125M
- LinkedIn following: 66,597 against 16,482
Dazz
- headcount growth: +13.7% against -0.5%
At a glance
| Measure | Aqua Security | Dazz |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud native security platform for prevention, detection, and response across the application lifecycle. | Automated remediation for security and development teams, fixing code flaws with one-click fixes. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cloud Native, Container | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Development, Vulnerability |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aqua Security | Dazz |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 466 | 52 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.5% | +13.7% |
| Total funding | $401M | $125M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $380M |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,597 | 16,482 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aqua Security | Dazz |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aqua Security | Dazz |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Aqua Security vs Dazz: common questions
Which is better, Aqua Security or Dazz?
Both score the same on our 0-100 rating, so the choice comes down to the 23 data points in the tables above rather than overall company strength.
How do Aqua Security and Dazz compare on the numbers?
Aqua Security leads on headcount (466 against 52), funding raised ($401M against $125M), LinkedIn following (66,597 against 16,482). Dazz leads on headcount growth (+13.7% against -0.5%).
Read the full Aqua Security review and pricing or the Dazz review and pricing. You can also browse other Aqua Security alternatives we track.