Aqua Security vs Cyberillium
Aqua Security vs Cyberillium, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aqua Security is on 69/100 and Cyberillium on 34/100.
Where each one leads
Aqua Security
- our overall score: 69/100 against 34/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 466 against 16
- headcount growth: -0.5% against -18.5%
- LinkedIn following: 66,597 against 484
Cyberillium
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Aqua Security | Cyberillium |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud native security platform for prevention, detection, and response across the application lifecycle. | Security research firm providing product security research and adversary simulation services. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cloud Native, Container | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Automotive, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aqua Security | Cyberillium |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 466 | 16 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.5% | -18.5% |
| Total funding | $401M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series E | Bootstrapped |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,597 | 484 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aqua Security | Cyberillium |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 34/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 12/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 1/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aqua Security | Cyberillium |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Aqua Security vs Cyberillium: common questions
Which is better, Aqua Security or Cyberillium?
On our 0-100 score Aqua Security rates higher (69/100 against 34/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aqua Security and Cyberillium compare on the numbers?
Aqua Security leads on our overall score (69/100 against 34/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 36/100), domain rating (78/100 against 1/100), headcount (466 against 16), headcount growth (-0.5% against -18.5%), LinkedIn following (66,597 against 484).
Read the full Aqua Security review and pricing or the Cyberillium review and pricing. You can also browse other Aqua Security alternatives we track.