Appwrite vs OpenOps
Appwrite vs OpenOps, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Appwrite is on 58/100 and OpenOps on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Appwrite
- our overall score: 58/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 23/100
- headcount: 37 against 11
- funding raised: $37.0M against $125K
- LinkedIn following: 35,404 against 3,220
OpenOps
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Appwrite | OpenOps |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source backend-as-a-service platform for building scalable applications. | No-code, open-source cloud automation platform for FinOps and custom solutions. |
| Category | Enterprise, Software Development, Open Source, Developer Tools | Enterprise, Governance, MLOps, Workflow Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Appwrite | OpenOps |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 37 | 11 |
| Total funding | $37.0M | $125K |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 35,404 | 3,220 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Appwrite | OpenOps |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 3/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 23/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Appwrite | OpenOps |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Sveltekit, Svelte, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Plausible | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes, 909 GitHub stars |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Appwrite | OpenOps |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Pre-packaged workflows, Operations & Monitoring, No-code customizability, Avoid vendor lock, Anomaly Management, Understand Allocation |
Appwrite vs OpenOps: common questions
Which is better, Appwrite or OpenOps?
On our 0-100 score Appwrite rates higher (58/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Appwrite and OpenOps compare on the numbers?
Appwrite leads on our overall score (58/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 41/100), domain rating (75/100 against 23/100), headcount (37 against 11), funding raised ($37.0M against $125K), LinkedIn following (35,404 against 3,220).
Read the full Appwrite review and pricing or the OpenOps review and pricing. You can also browse other Appwrite alternatives we track.