Appsflyer vs Bidalgo
Appsflyer vs Bidalgo, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Appsflyer is on 75/100 and Bidalgo on 37/100.
Where each one leads
Appsflyer
- our overall score: 75/100 against 37/100
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 1,668 against 5
- LinkedIn following: 110,740 against 9,585
Bidalgo
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Appsflyer | Bidalgo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AppsFlyer is a mobile attribution and marketing analytics platform that helps app developers and marketers measure and optimize campaign performance. | Bidalgo provides an AI-powered ad automation platform for app marketers to optimize user acquisition and maximize ROI. |
| Category | Marketing, Mobile, Mobile Attribution, Marketing Analytics | Marketing, Programmatic Media, Real-Time Bidding, Mobile Marketing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Appsflyer | Bidalgo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,668 | 5 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -35.5% |
| Total funding | $293M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series E | Not published |
| Valuation | $2.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 110,740 | 9,585 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Appsflyer | Bidalgo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 75/100 | 37/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 8/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 68/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Appsflyer | Bidalgo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Appsflyer | Bidalgo |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 4 negative across 6 threads | 4 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“AppsFlyer recently announced a Web SDK that applies mobile attribution to web campaigns to create a single source of truth. And that’s huge because as we all know, we’ve never had a unified way to attribute campaigns across all channels.”r/programmatic
“ironSource to Acquire Bidalgo, Further Deepening Its Platform Offering for App Developers With a Full-Stack Marketing Solution - IS.”r/Spacstocks
Appsflyer vs Bidalgo: common questions
Which is better, Appsflyer or Bidalgo?
On our 0-100 score Appsflyer rates higher (75/100 against 37/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Appsflyer and Bidalgo compare on the numbers?
Appsflyer leads on our overall score (75/100 against 37/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 21/100), domain rating (90/100 against 55/100), headcount (1,668 against 5), LinkedIn following (110,740 against 9,585).
What do real users say about Appsflyer and Bidalgo?
Appsflyer: 1 positive and 4 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/programmatic. Bidalgo: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Spacstocks.
Read the full Appsflyer review and pricing or the Bidalgo review and pricing. You can also browse other Appsflyer alternatives we track.