Applicaster vs Innocrux
Applicaster vs Innocrux, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Applicaster is on 48/100 and Innocrux on 31/100.
Where each one leads
Applicaster
- our overall score: 48/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 58/100 against 7/100
- headcount: 39 against 13
- LinkedIn following: 5,139 against 1,171
Innocrux
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Applicaster | Innocrux |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Applicaster provides a no/low-code app management platform for content owners and OTT providers to build and manage their video applications. | Leading video streaming solution provider for building OTT platforms. |
| Category | Low Code, No Code, OTT, Media | Software Development, OTT, Live Streaming, Video Streaming |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Gurugram, India |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Applicaster | Innocrux |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 13 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -3.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $41.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,139 | 1,171 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Applicaster | Innocrux |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 31/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 11/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 7/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Applicaster | Innocrux |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Applicaster | Innocrux |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 1 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“BroadcastAsia: MediaCorp announces new 'Toggle Now TV' developed by Applicaster.”r/denofgeek
Applicaster vs Innocrux: common questions
Which is better, Applicaster or Innocrux?
On our 0-100 score Applicaster rates higher (48/100 against 31/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Applicaster and Innocrux compare on the numbers?
Applicaster leads on our overall score (48/100 against 31/100), domain rating (58/100 against 7/100), headcount (39 against 13), LinkedIn following (5,139 against 1,171).
What do real users say about Applicaster and Innocrux?
Applicaster: 1 positive and 1 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/denofgeek.
Read the full Applicaster review and pricing or the Innocrux review and pricing. You can also browse other Applicaster alternatives we track.