Apate.ai vs Cleafy
Apate.ai vs Cleafy, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Apate.ai is on 53/100 and Cleafy on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Apate.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cleafy
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 32/100
- domain rating: 58/100 against 26/100
- funding raised: $24.8M against $2.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Apate.ai | Cleafy |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Apate.ai is an AI-powered fraud prevention and intelligence platform that uses conversational AI bots to combat scams proactively. | Cybersecurity platform for banks to detect and prevent attacks before they occur. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Fraud Prevention, AI Agent, Conversational AI | Cybersecurity, Financial Services, Banking, Fintech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2024 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Macquarie Park, Australia | Milan, Italy |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Apate.ai | Cleafy |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 17 | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.5M | $24.8M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,616 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Apate.ai | Cleafy |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 45/100 | 37/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 10/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 26/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Apate.ai | Cleafy |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Apate.ai vs Cleafy: common questions
Which is better, Apate.ai or Cleafy?
On our 0-100 score Cleafy rates higher (55/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Apate.ai and Cleafy compare on the numbers?
Cleafy leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 32/100), domain rating (58/100 against 26/100), funding raised ($24.8M against $2.5M).
Read the full Apate.ai review and pricing or the Cleafy review and pricing. You can also browse other Apate.ai alternatives we track.