Annapurna Labs vs Groq

Annapurna Labs vs Groq, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Annapurna Labs is on 59/100 and Groq on 66/100.

Annapurna Labs logo
Annapurna LabsAnnapurna Labs invents the next generation of cloud computing infrastructure, focusing on compute, machine learning, storage, and networking.
Try Annapurna Labs
Groq logo
GroqGroq develops a high-performance AI inference chip and compiler for ultra-low latency AI applications.
Try Groq

Where each one leads

Annapurna Labs

Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.

Groq

  • our overall score: 66/100 against 59/100
  • funding raised: $2.4B against $40.0M
  • LinkedIn following: 195,484 against 13,727

At a glance

MeasureAnnapurna LabsGroq
What it isAnnapurna Labs invents the next generation of cloud computing infrastructure, focusing on compute, machine learning, storage, and networking.Groq develops a high-performance AI inference chip and compiler for ultra-low latency AI applications.
CategoryStorage, Data Center, Semiconductor, AI ChipAI Hardware, AI Chip, Neural Network Accelerator, Foundation Model
Sells toBusiness modelB2BB2B
OfferingHardwareHardware
Founded20112016
HeadquartersTel Aviv, IsraelMountain View, United States
StatusActiveActive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureAnnapurna LabsGroq
Employees295339
Headcount growthLast 12 months+31.3%Not published
Total funding$40.0M$2.4B
Latest roundSeries BGrowth
ValuationNot published$1.0B
LinkedIn followers13,727195,484

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureAnnapurna LabsGroq
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating59/10066/100
Traction58/10060/100
Team70/10020/100
Community8/100Not published
Search visibility59/10074/100
Quality58/10078/100
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteF (37/100)F (39/100)
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-10085/10084/100

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureAnnapurna LabsGroq
HostingAWSVercel
CDNNot detectedVercel
FrameworksBootstrapNext.js
AnalyticsGoogle Analytics 4, Google Tag ManagerGoogle Tag Manager

What users say

MeasureAnnapurna LabsGroq
Reddit sentimentThreads we track1 positive, 2 negative across 4 threads2 positive, 2 negative across 6 threads
Annapurna Labs
Hey everyone, Just wanted to share my recent interview experience with AWS Annapurna Labs (L4 New Grad SDE role), since I’ve learned so much from this community, I thought it’d be good to give back. So here’s how it went: • Interview struct
r/leetcode
Groq
Saudi Arabia poised to become AI data center hub, says Groq CEO. Groq co-founder Ross was also there making deals with the Saudis. I just think this paints the Nvidia deal with Groq in a bit of a different light and provides some additional
r/stocks

Annapurna Labs vs Groq: common questions

Which is better, Annapurna Labs or Groq?

On our 0-100 score Groq rates higher (66/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do Annapurna Labs and Groq compare on the numbers?

Groq leads on our overall score (66/100 against 59/100), funding raised ($2.4B against $40.0M), LinkedIn following (195,484 against 13,727).

What do real users say about Annapurna Labs and Groq?

Annapurna Labs: 1 positive and 2 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/leetcode. Groq: 2 positive and 2 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/stocks.

Read the full Annapurna Labs review and pricing or the Groq review and pricing. You can also browse other Annapurna Labs alternatives we track.