Allurion Technologies vs Cerca Magnetics
Allurion Technologies vs Cerca Magnetics, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Allurion Technologies is on 53/100 and Cerca Magnetics on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Allurion Technologies
- agent readiness: 38/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 142 against 20
- funding raised: $172M against $6.8M
Cerca Magnetics
- our overall score: 63/100 against 53/100
At a glance
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Cerca Magnetics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A medical device company offering a comprehensive, swallowable gastric balloon program for weight loss. | Developing wearable brain imaging systems using quantum sensing technology. |
| Category | Medical Devices, Weight Management, Healthcare Technology, Biotechnology | Medical Devices, Biotechnology, Healthcare Technology, Quantum Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2009 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Natick, United States | Nottingham, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Cerca Magnetics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 142 | 20 |
| Total funding | $172M | $6.8M |
| Latest round | Private Placement | Series A |
| Valuation | $500M | $37.5M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 1,967 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Cerca Magnetics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 60/100 | 100/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 59/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Cerca Magnetics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Allurion Technologies vs Cerca Magnetics: common questions
Which is better, Allurion Technologies or Cerca Magnetics?
On our 0-100 score Cerca Magnetics rates higher (63/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Allurion Technologies and Cerca Magnetics compare on the numbers?
Allurion Technologies leads on agent readiness (38/100 against 22/100), domain rating (62/100 against 55/100), headcount (142 against 20), funding raised ($172M against $6.8M). Cerca Magnetics leads on our overall score (63/100 against 53/100).
Read the full Allurion Technologies review and pricing or the Cerca Magnetics review and pricing. You can also browse other Allurion Technologies alternatives we track.