Alloy vs Pipl
Alloy vs Pipl, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Alloy is on 62/100 and Pipl on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Alloy
- our overall score: 62/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 416 against 155
- funding raised: $207M against $19.0M
- LinkedIn following: 27,337 against 7,920
Pipl
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 49/100
At a glance
| Measure | Alloy | Pipl |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Identity risk management platform for financial institutions and fintechs to automate onboarding, fraud prevention, and compliance. | Pipl provides identity verification and fraud prevention solutions by leveraging a vast index of online identity data. |
| Category | Fintech, Identity Verification, Fraud Prevention, Compliance | Enterprise, Verification, Fraud, Identity Verification |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Alloy | Pipl |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 416 | 155 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -14.4% |
| Total funding | $207M | $19.0M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,337 | 7,920 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Alloy | Pipl |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Alloy | Pipl |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Alloy vs Pipl: common questions
Which is better, Alloy or Pipl?
On our 0-100 score Alloy rates higher (62/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Alloy and Pipl compare on the numbers?
Alloy leads on our overall score (62/100 against 55/100), headcount (416 against 155), funding raised ($207M against $19.0M), LinkedIn following (27,337 against 7,920). Pipl leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 49/100).
Read the full Alloy review and pricing or the Pipl review and pricing. You can also browse other Alloy alternatives we track.