Alloy vs Hypernative
Alloy vs Hypernative, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Alloy is on 62/100 and Hypernative on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Alloy
- domain rating: 73/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 416 against 93
- funding raised: $207M against $107M
- LinkedIn following: 27,337 against 6,799
Hypernative
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Alloy | Hypernative |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Identity risk management platform for financial institutions and fintechs to automate onboarding, fraud prevention, and compliance. | Hypernative provides real-time threat prevention and security for Web3, detecting and stopping cyber threats before they cause losses. |
| Category | Fintech, Identity Verification, Fraud Prevention, Compliance | Web3 Security, Cybersecurity, AI Threat Detection, Blockchain Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Alloy | Hypernative |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 416 | 93 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +84.5% |
| Open roles | Not published | 16 |
| Total funding | $207M | $107M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,337 | 6,799 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Alloy | Hypernative |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 53/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Alloy | Hypernative |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Alloy vs Hypernative: common questions
Which is better, Alloy or Hypernative?
Both score the same on our 0-100 rating, so the choice comes down to the 21 data points in the tables above rather than overall company strength.
How do Alloy and Hypernative compare on the numbers?
Alloy leads on domain rating (73/100 against 61/100), headcount (416 against 93), funding raised ($207M against $107M), LinkedIn following (27,337 against 6,799).
Read the full Alloy review and pricing or the Hypernative review and pricing. You can also browse other Alloy alternatives we track.