Alloy vs Fraud.net
Alloy vs Fraud.net, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Alloy is on 62/100 and Fraud.net on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Alloy
- our overall score: 62/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 416 against 64
- funding raised: $207M against $2.2M
- LinkedIn following: 27,337 against 9,478
Fraud.net
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Alloy | Fraud.net |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Identity risk management platform for financial institutions and fintechs to automate onboarding, fraud prevention, and compliance. | AI-driven platform for real-time fraud detection, risk management, and compliance. |
| Category | Fintech, Identity Verification, Fraud Prevention, Compliance | Fintech, Payments, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Alloy | Fraud.net |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 416 | 64 |
| Total funding | $207M | $2.2M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,337 | 9,478 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Alloy | Fraud.net |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Alloy | Fraud.net |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Alloy | Fraud.net |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 4 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads |
“Fraud.net's AI and Machine Learning Models offers an extensive range of solutions aimed at fraud detection and prevention. Leaning heavily on artificial intelligence and machine learning including deep learning and neural networks in combin”r/FutureTechFinds
Alloy vs Fraud.net: common questions
Which is better, Alloy or Fraud.net?
On our 0-100 score Alloy rates higher (62/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Alloy and Fraud.net compare on the numbers?
Alloy leads on our overall score (62/100 against 53/100), headcount (416 against 64), funding raised ($207M against $2.2M), LinkedIn following (27,337 against 9,478).
What do real users say about Alloy and Fraud.net?
Fraud.net: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FutureTechFinds.
Read the full Alloy review and pricing or the Fraud.net review and pricing. You can also browse other Alloy alternatives we track.