Alkira vs CATO Networks
Alkira vs CATO Networks, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Alkira is on 48/100 and CATO Networks on 74/100.
Where each one leads
Alkira
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
CATO Networks
- our overall score: 74/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 62/100
- headcount: 1,692 against 185
- funding raised: $951M against $176M
At a glance
| Measure | Alkira | CATO Networks |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud networking company focused on solving complex networking and AI infrastructure challenges. | The world's first SASE platform, converging SD-WAN, network security, and a global private backbone. |
| Category | Cloud Computing, Networking, Artificial Intelligence, AI Infrastructure | SASE, SD-WAN, Network Security, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Alkira | CATO Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 185 | 1,692 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +36.5% |
| Total funding | $176M | $951M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series H |
| Valuation | Not published | $3.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 191,952 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Alkira | CATO Networks |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 74/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 10/100 | 47/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Alkira | CATO Networks |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
Alkira vs CATO Networks: common questions
Which is better, Alkira or CATO Networks?
On our 0-100 score CATO Networks rates higher (74/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Alkira and CATO Networks compare on the numbers?
CATO Networks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 37/100), domain rating (76/100 against 62/100), headcount (1,692 against 185), funding raised ($951M against $176M).
Read the full Alkira review and pricing or the CATO Networks review and pricing. You can also browse other Alkira alternatives we track.