Adaptive Shield vs Twingate

Adaptive Shield vs Twingate, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Adaptive Shield is on 54/100 and Twingate on 61/100.

Adaptive Shield logo
Adaptive ShieldSaaS security platform for threat prevention, detection, and response across the entire SaaS stack.
Try Adaptive Shield
Twingate logo
TwingateTwingate provides a Zero Trust Network Access solution that replaces traditional VPNs for secure remote access.
Try Twingate

Where each one leads

Adaptive Shield

  • domain rating: 87/100 against 73/100

Twingate

  • our overall score: 61/100 against 54/100
  • agent readiness: 57/100 against 47/100
  • headcount: 84 against 17
  • funding raised: $62.0M against $10.0M
  • LinkedIn following: 6,806 against 4,834

At a glance

MeasureAdaptive ShieldTwingate
What it isSaaS security platform for threat prevention, detection, and response across the entire SaaS stack.Twingate provides a Zero Trust Network Access solution that replaces traditional VPNs for secure remote access.
CategoryCybersecurity, Enterprise, SaaS Security, Threat DetectionCybersecurity, Zero Trust, Network Access, Remote Access
Sells toBusiness modelB2BB2B
OfferingSoftwareSoftware
Founded20192019
HeadquartersTel Aviv, IsraelRedwood City, United States
StatusActiveActive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureAdaptive ShieldTwingate
Employees1784
Headcount growthLast 12 months-39.6%Not published
Total funding$10.0M$62.0M
Latest roundStrategicSeries B
ValuationNot published$400M
LinkedIn followers4,8346,806

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureAdaptive ShieldTwingate
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating54/10061/100
Traction48/10058/100
Team10/10070/100
Search visibility31/10034/100
Quality68/10068/100
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteD (47/100)D (57/100)
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-10087/10073/100

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureAdaptive ShieldTwingate
CDNCloudflareNot detected
CMSNot detectedFramer
Open sourceNoYes

Adaptive Shield vs Twingate: common questions

Which is better, Adaptive Shield or Twingate?

On our 0-100 score Twingate rates higher (61/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do Adaptive Shield and Twingate compare on the numbers?

Adaptive Shield leads on domain rating (87/100 against 73/100). Twingate leads on our overall score (61/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (57/100 against 47/100), headcount (84 against 17), funding raised ($62.0M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (6,806 against 4,834).

Read the full Adaptive Shield review and pricing or the Twingate review and pricing. You can also browse other Adaptive Shield alternatives we track.