Adaptive Shield vs Reco
Adaptive Shield vs Reco, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Adaptive Shield is on 54/100 and Reco on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Adaptive Shield
- domain rating: 87/100 against 68/100
Reco
- our overall score: 65/100 against 54/100
- headcount: 185 against 17
- headcount growth: +88.4% against -39.6%
- funding raised: $123M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 17,359 against 4,834
At a glance
| Measure | Adaptive Shield | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | SaaS security platform for threat prevention, detection, and response across the entire SaaS stack. | Identity-first SaaS security platform for discovering and controlling SaaS applications, identities, and data. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, SaaS Security, Threat Detection | Cybersecurity, SaaS Security, Cloud Security, Identity & Access Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Adaptive Shield | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 17 | 185 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -39.6% | +88.4% |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $123M |
| Latest round | Strategic | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,834 | 17,359 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Adaptive Shield | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 10/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 56/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 87/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Adaptive Shield | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Adaptive Shield vs Reco: common questions
Which is better, Adaptive Shield or Reco?
On our 0-100 score Reco rates higher (65/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Adaptive Shield and Reco compare on the numbers?
Adaptive Shield leads on domain rating (87/100 against 68/100). Reco leads on our overall score (65/100 against 54/100), headcount (185 against 17), headcount growth (+88.4% against -39.6%), funding raised ($123M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (17,359 against 4,834).
Read the full Adaptive Shield review and pricing or the Reco review and pricing. You can also browse other Adaptive Shield alternatives we track.