Activision Blizzard vs Tripledot Studios
Activision Blizzard vs Tripledot Studios, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Activision Blizzard is on 39/100 and Tripledot Studios on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Activision Blizzard
- domain rating: 71/100 against 39/100
- headcount: 1,433 against 570
- LinkedIn following: 332,385 against 44,923
Tripledot Studios
- our overall score: 70/100 against 39/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 22/100
At a glance
| Measure | Activision Blizzard | Tripledot Studios |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A leading global interactive entertainment company that develops and publishes video games. | Fastest-growing European mobile game developer entertaining hundreds of millions globally. |
| Category | Gaming, Video Games, Entertainment, Consumer App | Gaming, Mobile Games, Casual Games, Hypercasual Games |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2008 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Santa Monica, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Activision Blizzard | Tripledot Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,433 | 570 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +14.1% |
| Total funding | Not published | $202M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 332,385 | 44,923 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Activision Blizzard | Tripledot Studios |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 79/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 39/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Activision Blizzard | Tripledot Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Wix |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Activision Blizzard vs Tripledot Studios: common questions
Which is better, Activision Blizzard or Tripledot Studios?
On our 0-100 score Tripledot Studios rates higher (70/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Activision Blizzard and Tripledot Studios compare on the numbers?
Activision Blizzard leads on domain rating (71/100 against 39/100), headcount (1,433 against 570), LinkedIn following (332,385 against 44,923). Tripledot Studios leads on our overall score (70/100 against 39/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 22/100).
Read the full Activision Blizzard review and pricing or the Tripledot Studios review and pricing. You can also browse other Activision Blizzard alternatives we track.