Accelerant Holdings vs Root
Accelerant Holdings vs Root, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Accelerant Holdings is on 66/100 and Root on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Accelerant Holdings
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 33/100
- LinkedIn following: 112,537 against 52,266
Root
- headcount: 1,197 against 649
- funding raised: $1.4B against $150M
At a glance
| Measure | Accelerant Holdings | Root |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A cloud platform connecting specialty insurance MGAs with insurers and other capital providers, enabling access to capital for underwriting through advanced analytics and real-time data. | Root Inc. offers personalized car insurance based on driving behavior, managed via a mobile app. |
| Category | InsurTech, Artificial Intelligence, Fintech, Specialty Insurance | InsurTech, Parametric Insurance, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance, Usage-Based Insurance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Atlanta, United States | Columbus, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Accelerant Holdings | Root |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 649 | 1,197 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +4.2% |
| Total funding | $150M | $1.4B |
| Latest round | PE | Debt |
| Valuation | $4.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 112,537 | 52,266 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Accelerant Holdings | Root |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 20/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Accelerant Holdings | Root |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Gatsby |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
Accelerant Holdings vs Root: common questions
Which is better, Accelerant Holdings or Root?
On our 0-100 score Accelerant Holdings rates higher (66/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Accelerant Holdings and Root compare on the numbers?
Accelerant Holdings leads on agent readiness (41/100 against 33/100), LinkedIn following (112,537 against 52,266). Root leads on headcount (1,197 against 649), funding raised ($1.4B against $150M).
Read the full Accelerant Holdings review and pricing or the Root review and pricing. You can also browse other Accelerant Holdings alternatives we track.