A.Team vs Fiverr
A.Team vs Fiverr, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: A.Team is on 64/100 and Fiverr on 64/100.
Where each one leads
A.Team
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 21/100
Fiverr
- domain rating: 81/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 750 against 228
- funding raised: $105M against $70.0M
- LinkedIn following: 1,154,153 against 22,991
At a glance
| Measure | A.Team | Fiverr |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Members-only network of top engineers, PMs, designers, and marketers for accelerated product development. | A global online marketplace connecting businesses with freelance talent for a wide range of digital services. |
| Category | Enterprise, Network, Talent, Product Development | Gig Economy, Marketplace, Freelance, Freelance Marketplace |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | A.Team | Fiverr |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 228 | 750 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.8% | Not published |
| Open roles | 2 | Not published |
| Total funding | $70.0M | $105M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $262M |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,991 | 1,154,153 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | A.Team | Fiverr |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 81/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | A.Team | Fiverr |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | A.Team | Fiverr |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 2 negative across 6 threads |
“Whenever someone tries or thinks about growing, most of you have definitely heard these words: “Fiverr is dead,” and that only people who started during COVID like 2020 are still making it, and there’s no way to get new gigs. But that is wr”r/Fiverr
A.Team vs Fiverr: common questions
Which is better, A.Team or Fiverr?
Both score the same on our 0-100 rating, so the choice comes down to the 19 data points in the tables above rather than overall company strength.
How do A.Team and Fiverr compare on the numbers?
A.Team leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 21/100). Fiverr leads on domain rating (81/100 against 59/100), headcount (750 against 228), funding raised ($105M against $70.0M), LinkedIn following (1,154,153 against 22,991).
What do real users say about A.Team and Fiverr?
Fiverr: 2 positive and 2 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Fiverr.
Read the full A.Team review and pricing or the Fiverr review and pricing. You can also browse other A.Team alternatives we track.