645 Ventures vs Accel
645 Ventures vs Accel, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 645 Ventures is on 43/100 and Accel on 29/100.
Where each one leads
645 Ventures
- our overall score: 43/100 against 29/100
Accel
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 32/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 150 against 10
- funding raised: $20B against $63.0M
At a glance
| Measure | 645 Ventures | Accel |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Venture capital firm focused on early-stage technology companies. | Venture capital firm investing in early-stage and growth-stage technology companies. |
| Category | Venture Capital, Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Software | Venture Capital, Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2015 | 1983 |
| Headquarters | New York, USA | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 645 Ventures | Accel |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 10 | 150 |
| Total funding | $63.0M | $20B |
| Latest round | Venture Round | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 645 Ventures | Accel |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 29/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 10/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 48/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 645 Ventures | Accel |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
645 Ventures vs Accel: common questions
Which is better, 645 Ventures or Accel?
On our 0-100 score 645 Ventures rates higher (43/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 645 Ventures and Accel compare on the numbers?
645 Ventures leads on our overall score (43/100 against 29/100). Accel leads on agent readiness (41/100 against 32/100), domain rating (76/100 against 48/100), headcount (150 against 10), funding raised ($20B against $63.0M).
Read the full 645 Ventures review and pricing or the Accel review and pricing. You can also browse other 645 Ventures alternatives we track.