500 Startups vs Sequoia Capital
500 Startups vs Sequoia Capital, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: 500 Startups is on 70/100 and Sequoia Capital on 32/100.
Where each one leads
500 Startups
- our overall score: 70/100 against 32/100
Sequoia Capital
- funding raised: $3.1B against $140M
At a glance
| Measure | 500 Startups | Sequoia Capital |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global venture capital firm investing in ambitious founders building fast-growing technology companies. | Global venture capital firm backing early-stage and growth-stage technology companies. |
| Category | Venture Capital, Startup Accelerator, Seed Funding, Early Stage Investing | Venture Capital, Investment, Seed Stage Investment, Early Stage Investment |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2010 | 1972 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Menlo Park, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | 500 Startups | Sequoia Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,707 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +23.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $140M | $3.1B |
| Latest round | Global Flagship Fund | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 376,122 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | 500 Startups | Sequoia Capital |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 32/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 40/100 |
| Team | 72/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 100/100 | 48/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 25/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | D (56/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 81/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | 500 Startups | Sequoia Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Self Managed |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Segment, Parsely, Jetpack Stats |
What users say
| Measure | 500 Startups | Sequoia Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“500 Startups. We're kind of a big deal. #500strong”r/
500 Startups vs Sequoia Capital: common questions
Which is better, 500 Startups or Sequoia Capital?
On our 0-100 score 500 Startups rates higher (70/100 against 32/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do 500 Startups and Sequoia Capital compare on the numbers?
500 Startups leads on our overall score (70/100 against 32/100). Sequoia Capital leads on funding raised ($3.1B against $140M).
What do real users say about 500 Startups and Sequoia Capital?
500 Startups: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full 500 Startups review and pricing or the Sequoia Capital review and pricing. You can also browse other 500 Startups alternatives we track.