Episode 51 · September 28, 2026
Today in AI: Self-Improving Agents and the Loop as Product
Today, Ada and Sam dive into the exciting world of self-improving AI agents, from Weights & Biases' Arya learning to rewrite itself to Autoheal's new funding for agent factories. We also explore the critical role of experimental loops for long-horizon agents and the emerging philosophy of the 'loop as product' in AI development.
In this episode
- AMD to pay $8.2B for Fei-Fei Li's World Labs
- Tabular foundation models still stumble beyond IID
- Autoheal raised $7.9M to heal its own agents
- Weights & Biases made its agent improve itself
- Mango Rumors Exposed What Long Agents Forget
- How to Find Stealth Startups in 2026
- The loop is the product, not the model
Transcript
Ada: Welcome to Today in AI, I'm Ada.
Sam: And I'm Sam. Today, we're talking about AI agents getting smarter, learning to heal themselves, and why the 'loop' is becoming the ultimate product.
Ada: Absolutely, Sam. Kicking us off with a really significant development: Weights & Biases has made its agent, Arya, improve itself. This isn't just about iterating on an agent, it's about the agent actively rewriting its own code. Arya logs production traces in Weave and then uses that data to rewrite itself against a massive set of YAML tasks, eight hundred eighty-six of them. We're seeing around sixty-six percent improvement on some task families.
Sam: That's a huge step towards truly autonomous AI. It's one thing to have an agent perform a task, it's another entirely for it to analyze its own performance and then modify its underlying logic to do better. This isn't just a bug fix, it's self-evolution. It shows a powerful feedback loop in action: observe, analyze, adapt, repeat. This kind of self-improvement is really what we've been talking about when we imagine the future of AI agents.
Ada: Exactly. And it ties directly into our next story, which is Autoheal raising seven point nine million dollars in seed funding, led by Innovation Endeavors. Their mission is to scale their self-improving factory for agents. They've already tested this with big names like Nomura Bank and AvidXchange. It's one thing for a research team to achieve self-improvement, it's another to productize it and make it scalable for enterprises.
Sam: This is the commercialization of that self-healing, self-improving agent concept. Autoheal is essentially building the infrastructure for agents to not just operate, but to continuously optimize themselves in a production environment. Think about the implications for reliability and efficiency. If an agent can identify and fix its own errors, or even just improve its performance over time, that dramatically reduces the human oversight needed and increases the value it delivers. It's a factory that gets better at making itself.
Ada: A factory of intelligence, if you will. Moving on, Erina Karati exposed a critical challenge for long-horizon agents at the AI Engineer conference. She presented Project Paradox and argued that these agents, the ones designed for complex, multi-step tasks, desperately need experimental loops. Her work showed how easily rumor spread and memory provenance become issues. Essentially, the longer an agent operates, the more susceptible it is to forgetting key information or misinterpreting its own past actions.
Sam: This is a really insightful point. We often focus on the agent's ability to plan or execute, but Karati highlights the cognitive architecture needed for sustained, reliable operation. If an agent can't remember why it did something, or if it starts to 'believe' incorrect information over a long sequence of interactions, its effectiveness plummets. Experimental loops, which allow the agent to test its understanding and verify information, are crucial for building robust, long-term agency. It's like a human needing to periodically re-evaluate their assumptions.
Ada: It speaks to the need for a more dynamic, less linear approach to agent design. And this idea of 'the loop' as central really resonates with our next story. Roland Gavrilescu, also at AI Engineer, declared that the product is the loop, not just the model. He talked about using portable recipes on platforms like Pi and Harbor to distill 'taste' and 'valued work per watt' as the score to beat. It's a shift in how we define and measure success in AI products.
Sam: This is a profound philosophical shift for AI product development. Instead of just delivering a trained model, the real value is in the continuous feedback loop that refines, optimizes, and delivers ongoing value. 'Taste' and 'valued work per watt' are fascinating metrics, moving beyond raw accuracy to encompass efficiency, user experience, and alignment with desired outcomes. It's about the iterative process of improvement, not just the static artifact of a model. If your product is the loop, then you're always shipping, always improving.
Ada: It's about the journey, not just the destination, in AI terms. Shifting gears slightly, but still within the startup ecosystem, we have a helpful tip for those looking to stay ahead: how to find stealth startups in two thousand twenty-six. StartupHub is sharing some strategies here. You can filter your search, open a profile, check a known domain, set a monitor, and even email the company directly. It's all about proactive discovery.
Sam: This is invaluable for investors, recruiters, and even other founders looking for partnership opportunities. Stealth startups are often where the most innovative and disruptive ideas are brewing, before they hit the mainstream. Having a systematic approach to uncover them, using tools like StartupHub's filtering and monitoring capabilities, gives you a significant edge. It's about being an early identifier of future trends and market shakers.
Ada: Absolutely. And finally, a bit of a reality check in the world of foundation models. BeyondArena tested eleven models on one hundred forty-two datasets and found that tabular foundation models, while strong on small, independent and identically distributed data, still stumble when it comes to large and non-IID tasks. They trail traditional gradient-boosted decision trees in those scenarios.
Sam: This is a critical finding. The hype around foundation models often suggests they're a panacea for all data types, but this report reminds us of their limitations, especially with tabular data. Gradient-boosted decision trees have been refined over decades for this exact type of data, and their performance on large, real-world, non-IID datasets is still superior. It underscores that while foundation models are powerful, they aren't always the optimal solution for every problem, and understanding data characteristics remains paramount in model selection.
Ada: It's a good reminder that the right tool for the job still matters. And that wraps up our top stories for today. For the full details on all these developments and more, head over to startuphub.ai.
Sam: That's startuphub.ai. We'll be back tomorrow with more 'Today in AI'.