"AI is decimating entry-level jobs." This stark declaration from Andrew Yang, founder and CEO of Noble Mobile, and former Democratic presidential candidate, cut through the morning bustle of CNBC's 'Squawk Box.' Speaking with interviewers Andrew Ross Sorkin and Becky Quick, Yang offered a compelling commentary on the intertwined forces of technological disruption and political realignment, using the microcosm of the New York City mayoral race to illustrate broader national anxieties. His insights traversed the impact of artificial intelligence on employment, the evolving public sentiment towards economic systems, and the surprising turns in local politics, all framed by his signature focus on the future of work.
Yang’s core thesis posits that artificial intelligence represents a seismic shift, fundamentally altering the economic landscape and challenging foundational assumptions about opportunity. This technological revolution, while promising "exuberant optimism" in terms of valuation for leading AI firms like Microsoft, Meta, and Google, concurrently implies a future with "a lot less jobs." The revenue growth these companies must achieve to justify their massive investments in computing infrastructure and AI will inevitably come from increased productivity, often meaning the automation and elimination of human labor.
This impending wave of job displacement, particularly in entry-level sectors, directly undermines the traditional "American dream that your kid goes to college, will get a good job." Yang observes that this aspiration is becoming "less likely as entry-level jobs get automated." Such economic precarity, he argues, fuels a growing disaffection with the prevailing capitalist model.
The frustration is palpable, and according to Yang, "The anger and frustration around this version of capitalism is going to get stronger and stronger, and it's not just a New York thing, it's an America thing." This sentiment, he contends, is directly "compounding" the impact of AI. It’s a powerful undercurrent shaping political discourse and voter behavior, leading to a re-evaluation of established norms and an openness to alternative economic philosophies.
Yang cited the New York City mayoral race as a prime example of this political shift. While he refrained from endorsing a candidate, he noted the tightening race and the demographic trends favoring Andrew Cuomo in early voting. He also offered a nuanced view of Zohran Mamdani, describing him as a "very charming, very charismatic, and very intelligent guy." Mamdani's pragmatic decision to retain the police commissioner, Jessica Tish, a figure with "a huge amount of gravitas and credibility with the rank and file police officers," was highlighted as a positive signal to many.
However, the conversation quickly pivoted to Mamdani's self-identification as a socialist. Sorkin pressed Yang on whether voters truly understood or believed Mamdani's socialist leanings, given past statements about "seizing the means of production." Yang acknowledged a "bad habit" of voters dismissing radical statements as mere rhetoric, yet he believes Mamdani has been "pretty clear about where he stands on being a socialist." He highlighted that "people do not want to see over the last decade plus, the elites controlling things," a sentiment reflected in Mamdani's campaign slogan, "New York is not for sale." This populist message resonates with a segment of the electorate that feels let down by the current economic system.
Related Reading
- AI's Job Transformation: Tech Leaders Chart a Nuanced Future
- Powell Cautiously Monitors AI's Impact on Jobs and a Bifurcated Economy
- AI's Economic Churn: Layoffs, Trillion-Dollar Valuations, and the Shifting Labor Landscape
Yang also touched upon his latest venture, Noble Mobile, a wireless carrier with the unconventional goal of encouraging customers to limit their phone use. This initiative, though briefly mentioned, aligns with his broader concern for human well-being in an increasingly technology-saturated world, suggesting a desire to temper the potentially isolating or detrimental aspects of digital advancement. It reflects a consistent thread in his public life: addressing the human impact of technological and economic shifts.
The discussion underscores a critical juncture where rapid technological advancement, particularly in AI, is exacerbating existing economic inequalities and anxieties. This, in turn, is driving a profound political reordering, where traditional allegiances and ideologies are being questioned. The outcome in New York City, and indeed across the nation, will hinge on how effectively leaders address these fundamental challenges, balancing innovation with equitable societal adaptation.
