Visitor Filters vs Wordfence
Visitor Filters vs Wordfence, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Visitor Filters is on 24/100 and Wordfence on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Visitor Filters
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 41/100
Wordfence
- our overall score: 54/100 against 24/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 5/100
At a glance
| Measure | Visitor Filters | Wordfence |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Protects websites from bots, scrapers, and malicious traffic with real-time IP filtering and geo-blocking. | Comprehensive WordPress security plugin offering firewall, malware scanner, and login protection. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Web Security, Bot Mitigation | Cybersecurity, Endpoint Security, Threat Detection, Web Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Silistra, Bulgaria | Indianapolis, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Visitor Filters | Wordfence |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | Not published | $28.1M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Visitor Filters | Wordfence |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 24/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 37/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | 25/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 12/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (54/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 5/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Visitor Filters | Wordfence |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | Freshdesk, HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Visitor Filters | Wordfence |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 6 negative across 6 threads |
“Well, I have so far always used Wordfence to secure my sites, but one thing they all had in common was the clutter i received in the databases. Is there a way to avoid this? Or shall I use an alternative?”r/Wordpress
Visitor Filters vs Wordfence: common questions
Which is better, Visitor Filters or Wordfence?
On our 0-100 score Wordfence rates higher (54/100 against 24/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Visitor Filters and Wordfence compare on the numbers?
Visitor Filters leads on agent readiness (54/100 against 41/100). Wordfence leads on our overall score (54/100 against 24/100), domain rating (91/100 against 5/100).
What do real users say about Visitor Filters and Wordfence?
Wordfence: 0 positive and 6 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Wordpress.
Read the full Visitor Filters review and pricing or the Wordfence review and pricing. You can also browse other Visitor Filters alternatives we track.