Veracode vs XBOW
Veracode vs XBOW, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Veracode is on 62/100 and XBOW on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Veracode
- our overall score: 62/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 71/100
XBOW
- funding raised: $215M against $40.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Veracode | XBOW |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Veracode provides a SaaS platform for application security testing and risk management. | Leader in autonomous offensive security, providing AI-powered penetration testing and vulnerability assessment platforms. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, SaaS, Software Development | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Software, AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2006 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Burlington, United States | Seattle, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Veracode | XBOW |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 503 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -10.4% | Not published |
| Open roles | Not published | 3 |
| Total funding | $40.0M | $215M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 85,248 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Veracode | XBOW |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Veracode | XBOW |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Veracode vs XBOW: common questions
Which is better, Veracode or XBOW?
On our 0-100 score Veracode rates higher (62/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Veracode and XBOW compare on the numbers?
Veracode leads on our overall score (62/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 37/100), domain rating (80/100 against 71/100). XBOW leads on funding raised ($215M against $40.0M).
Read the full Veracode review and pricing or the XBOW review and pricing. You can also browse other Veracode alternatives we track.