Urecsys vs WINT
Urecsys vs WINT, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Urecsys is on 53/100 and WINT on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Urecsys
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
WINT
- our overall score: 63/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 8/100
- headcount: 122 against 27
- funding raised: $50.0M against $14.0M
- LinkedIn following: 7,852 against 1,751
At a glance
| Measure | Urecsys | WINT |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Urecsys optimizes indoor air quality by using AI and machine learning to adjust outdoor airflow based on real-time pollution levels. | AI-powered water intelligence solutions for leak prevention and water management. |
| Category | Smart Building, Air Quality, Indoor, Outdoor | Industrial, Water Management, IoT, Commercial Property |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Seoul, South Korea | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Urecsys | WINT |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 27 | 122 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +11.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $14.0M | $50.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| Valuation | $50.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,751 | 7,852 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Urecsys | WINT |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 8/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Urecsys | WINT |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Urecsys vs WINT: common questions
Which is better, Urecsys or WINT?
On our 0-100 score WINT rates higher (63/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Urecsys and WINT compare on the numbers?
WINT leads on our overall score (63/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 21/100), domain rating (55/100 against 8/100), headcount (122 against 27), funding raised ($50.0M against $14.0M), LinkedIn following (7,852 against 1,751).
Read the full Urecsys review and pricing or the WINT review and pricing. You can also browse other Urecsys alternatives we track.